http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/ “It is impossible for a software organization to be saved in ignorance.” Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:20:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-1068 Jonathan Krein Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:50:39 +0000 http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-1068 The closing comment was great! The closing comment was great!

]]> http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-1019 David Hill Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:26:49 +0000 http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-1019 That's just priceless. That’s just priceless.

]]> http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-983 Mike Carey Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:44:31 +0000 http://www.charlesknutson.net/2008/09/27/burger-king-most-valuable-bag/#comment-983 Yeah, the '12#' does translate to 12 lb. I used to work for Chick-fil-a, and we would always refer to bag sizes as 4 lb (small bags, not often used), 8 lb (medium, used most frequently), and 12 lb (large bags, for large orders). I can't remember if the number was supposed to represent the weight of the bundle of bags that we received or the approximate holding capability of the bag. I agree, though, that the whole "MVB" argument, with the 12# as support, is really quite a stretch! Yeah, the ‘12#’ does translate to 12 lb. I used to work for Chick-fil-a, and we would always refer to bag sizes as 4 lb (small bags, not often used), 8 lb (medium, used most frequently), and 12 lb (large bags, for large orders). I can’t remember if the number was supposed to represent the weight of the bundle of bags that we received or the approximate holding capability of the bag. I agree, though, that the whole “MVB” argument, with the 12# as support, is really quite a stretch!

]]>